Radio essay on Dahl’s Matilda

Thanks bundleofbooks for this one, via Twitter – a BBC Radio series called Happily Ever After, all about the portrayal of family in children’s literature. I just listened to Anthony Horowitz talking about the horrible Wormwoods in Roald Dahl’s Matilda. Very interesting and with a thought-provoking finish: should Matilda have chosen to go with her parents at the end?

To listen online, click here. (The audio file is 24 min long, but Horowitz’s essay is just the first 15 minutes.)

To read my review of Matilda, click here.

The Guardian: “Parental Supervision Not Required…”

This is worth a read – “Parental Supervision Not Required: The Freedom of Classic Children’s Fiction” by Sarah Hall in The Guardian.

Not without interest, though a bit obvious – “the heroes of classic children’s fiction enjoyed far less restricted lifestyles than kids do today. Is that why their stories still appeal?” Um, yes?

One wonders about future classic novels set in our time, in which young heroes and heroines must manage to have adventures within the confines of their own living rooms…

Strangely enough, the comments on this article are thoughtful and interesting themselves. (Now that is rare!) Apart from (presumably) elderly rants about today’s lazy parents plunking their kids in front of tv sets and computers, there are some very good points made. Namely:

1. re. Swallows and Amazons-style adventuring – kids never had that much freedom! These books were regarded as fantastical even when they were written.

2. the main reason that children are prevented from walking about unsupervised is not because of parents crazily paranoid about abduction, but because of the danger from motor vehicles – witness the sheer number of vehicles on the roads and the lack of skill and care of the drivers, not to mention road rage, cell phone use, etc. And no longer are there any really quiet streets. Even in my fairly child-friendly neighbourhood cars regularly roll through four-way stops and ignore the school crosswalks.

Media Tips for Babies and Toddlers, from Common Sense Media

A (very) brief article on Common Sense Media about the American Academy of Pediatrics’ recommendation re. babies and screentime. Also includes link to results of a survey done by Common Sense entitled Zero to Eight: Children’s Media Use in America.

Highlights:

No screen time for babies under 2. The Real World is still the best teacher!

There is no software that will make your child more ‘school-ready’.

Letting your kids have tv’s in their bedrooms is a bad idea.

What are babies thinking?

This is a terrific TED talk about what is going on in our children’s heads… more than you might think… Also, a suggested link between length of childhood and intelligence of species.

I love this stuff! Have already ordered her latest book from my library…

Are Your Kids Really Ready for Scary Movies?

Commonsense Media has posted some advice for parents about scary movies.

Changes to classic Richard Scarry book

I’ve discovered an interesting comparison between 1963 and 1980/1991 editions of Richard Scarry’s Best Word Book Ever posted on the website Sociological Images.

Apparently it’s easy to get outraged about “bowdlerization” of the classics and the perceived crimes of “PCness” (read the endless comments!… no, don’t), but one must remember that this is a reference book, a word book teaching vocabulary, and its purpose is not compromised in the least by these changes. (It’s not like an actual plot is being changed or anything, since there is no plot.) The only loss is a bit of the humour (the “beautiful screaming lady” in the burning house I thought was kind of funny).

Still, it is an interesting exercise to see exactly what has been changed and how. The gender changes accomplished simply through the addition of a hair ribbon I particularly liked.

For the original, more detailed comparison on Alan Taylor’s Flickr stream, go here. (Alan’s comparison was done between the 1963 and 1991 editions, though several comments mention that the 1980 version is the same as the 1991.)

Spongebob vs Caillou! (new study)

A new study was released today comparing the attention spans of four-year-olds watching two programs, SpongeBob Squarepants and Caillou (with a third group drawing pictures instead of watching tv).

After just nine minutes the SpongeBob  group showed “temporary attention and learning problems” – in sharp contrast to the other two groups.

The official Nickelodeon defense is of course that SpongeBob is aimed at an older audience than four-year-olds, but that does not reduce the value of this research. While the test group was quite small and further studies seem to be called for, it still raises important questions about how certain programs can affect attention span and “executive function”. It also helps to underline how important age-appropriate programming is. For non-parents it would seem a no-brainer that you shouldn’t show your toddler older programming, however in this day and age it is becoming impossible to control what your child is watching with televisions blaring in so many public spaces. Case in point: the ferry ride we took recently that played SpongeBob in the play area for well over an hour!

(For full story about study click here.)

Jack Zipes interview re. Fairy Tale Movies

Here’s a Salon interview with fairy tale scholar Jack Zipes, promoting his book The Enchanted Screen: The Unknown History of Fairy-Tale Films. Jack Zipes has written voluminously about fairy tales and modern consumer culture, and can always be counted on for a really curmudgeonly viewpoint. (Which I always enjoy.)

Another aspect of the current spate of “dark” movie versions of fairy tales that they don’t talk about here is that these films are obviously not intended for children to see. In one sense, this is actually true to ancient fairy tale tradition, after all the stories were told orally to whomever was around to hear them. They were not created specifically for children. So modern movies may actually be liberating the old tales from the “ghetto” of children’s amusements where they have been languishing for over a hundred years.

The downside of very dark fairy tale movies (plus the very adult comic book hero movies), is that they reflect the growing childishness of “grownups”. No more putting aside of childish things when we grow up – today adulthood simply means we are finally able to buy all the expensive toys we want and play games all day. The entertainment industry caters to the new infantilized adult, serving up children’s movies that aren’t really made for children (Pixar and comic book movies) and endless childish tv shows and games on very mature topics.

Um, but this article isn’t really about that. That was just me venting again…

Read the article here.

Click to Jack Zipes’ book on amazon here.

New York Times article on Boys and Reading

I just read an interesting article from the New York Times entitled “Boys and Reading: Is There Any Hope?” by novelist Robert Lipsyte.

Strangely enough, the same “mostly true” cliché he cites (that girls will read books about boys but boys won’t read books with female main characters) exists in children’s television as well: girls will watch ‘boy shows’ but boys will not watch ‘girl shows’. But whereas in publishing this theory has led to fewer and fewer ‘boys’ books’, in television the result has been fewer and fewer girl characters.

Why? I think it’s because book publishers are wary about aiming product directly at a gender that doesn’t read so much, so as a result they hedge their bets. They add female characters to the boys books (as the author states) to hopefully entice the legions of girl readers.

In television-land – Hunter S. Thompson’s “long plastic hallway where thieves and pimps run free and good men die like dogs” ¹there is no such thing as a “reluctant boy tv-watcher”, so the impulse is instead to reduce the number of girls on all sides, because you can conceivably capture both genders as an audience for your show as long as you don’t scare off the boys with too many alpha females onscreen. So, more often than not, when you have an ensemble cast of 5… 3 will be boys. If there are 3 characters, 2 will be boys. Girls are to be kept in the pert and pretty minority.

But I digress. Interesting article, like I said.

________________________________

¹ Sigh. I never get tired of using that quote!  Hunter S. Thompson, Generation of Swine: Tales of Shame and Degradation in the ’80s (New York: Summit Books, 1988), p. 43.

What Scares Your Child?


Now, before I even get started, before any of you jump on me for being overly protective and censorious, I’m not talking about little scares here. I’m talking about the kind of fright that can cause sleepless nights or change behavior patterns. And these serious kinds of scares are more common than you’d think. As Joanne Cantor writes in “Mommy, I’m Scared”: How TV and Movies Frighten Children and What We can Do to Protect Them:

“If your child has a severe fright reaction, you are certainly not alone. Your child is not odd, unstable, or otherwise unbalanced, and there are good reasons why the reaction occurred. Sharing your experience with others will no doubt be therapeutic for you, and it’s important to warn other parents about potential effects on their children.” ¹ More

Previous Older Entries Next Newer Entries

All writings posted here are © Kim Thompson, unless otherwise indicated. For all artwork on this site, copyright is retained by the artist.